4.7 Article

Nanostructured Pt and Pt-Sn catalysts supported on oxidized carbon nanotubes for ethanol and ethylene glycol electro-oxidation

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 36, 期 5, 页码 3313-3321

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.12.020

关键词

Pt-Sn alloys; Nanostructured catalysts; Electrodeposition; Ethanol and ethylene glycol electro-oxidation

资金

  1. ANPCYT [10-11133]
  2. UNS [24/M097]
  3. CIC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pt and Pt-Sn catalysts supported on oxidized carbon nanotubes were prepared by multiple potentiostatic pulses and tested for ethanol and ethylene glycol electro-oxidation in sulfuric acid. The composed nanostructured materials were characterized via SEM, TEM, EDX and XRD analysis. Small metal nanoparticles (4-6 nm) forming 3-D nanostructured agglomerates (25-100 nm) distributed over the carbon substrate were formed. XRD results showed that the bimetallic electrocatalysts consisted of a Pt single-phase material, suggesting the formation of solid solutions over the entire composition range. The tin content in the alloys was between 10 and 40 at. %. Cyclic voltammetry and chronoamperometry measurements at room temperature showed that at potentials below 0.5 V, the bimetallic catalyst with 40 at. % Sn exhibited the highest activity for ethanol and ethylene glycol oxidation, whereas at potentials above 0.5 V, the alloy with 25 at. % Sn displayed better performance. This behavior can be explained by the synergistic effect between the facilitation of alcohol oxidation via oxygen-containing species adsorbed on Sn atoms, the alteration of the electronic structure of Pt atoms that weakens CO and intermediates adsorption, and the adequate Pt ensembles size. Besides, the increment of the lattice parameter and the presence of grain boundaries can enhance the adsorption of the alcohols and favor the splitting of the C-C bond. Copyright (C) 2010, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据