4.7 Article

Manganese oxide based thermochemical hydrogen production cycle

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 36, 期 12, 页码 7028-7037

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.03.003

关键词

Thermochemical water splitting; Hydrogen generation; Manganese oxide

资金

  1. Department of Energy [DE-FC36-05GO150]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A MnO/NaOH based three-step thermochemical water splitting cycle was modified to improve the hydrolysis of alpha-NamnO(2) (sodium manganate) and to recover Mn(III) oxides for the high-temperature reduction step. Sodium manganate forms in the reaction of NaOH with MnO that releases hydrogen. The hydrolysis of alpha-NaMnO2 to manganese oxides and NaOH is incomplete even with a large excess of water and more than 10% sodium cannot be removed prior to the high-temperature reduction step. When mixed oxides of manganese with iron were used in the cycle, the NaOH recovery in the hydrolysis step improved from about 10% to 35% at NaOH concentrations above 1M. Only 60% sodium was removed at 0.5M from the mixed oxides whereas more than 80% can be recovered at the same NaOH concentration when only manganese oxides are used. A 10:1 Mn/Fe sample was cycled through all steps three times to confirm that multiple cycles are possible. The high-temperature reduction was carried out for 5h at 1773 K under vacuum and the conversion was about 65% after the 3rd cycle. Since sodium carryover into the high-temperature reduction cannot be avoided, even with the energy intensive hydrolysis step, a modified two-step cycle without lowtemperature sodium recovery is proposed where alpha-NaMnO2 is reduced directly to MnO at 1773 K under vacuum. On a laboratory scale, about 60% of the sodium that volatilized at the high temperatures was trapped with a water-cooled cold finger and conversions were stable at about 35% after three completed cycles. Copyright (C) 2011, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据