4.7 Article

Analysis of liquid water transport in cathode catalyst layer of PEM fuel cells

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 35, 期 6, 页码 2403-2416

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.12.160

关键词

Analytical formulation; Cathode catalyst layer; Liquid water transport; PEM fuel cell; Water flooding

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. National Research Council of Canada
  3. Ontario Graduate Scholarship program
  4. University of Waterloo

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The performance of a polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cell is significantly affected by liquid water generated at the cathode catalyst layer (CCL) potentially causing water flooding of cathode; while the ionic conductivity of PEM is directly proportional to its water content. Therefore, it is essential to maintain a delicate water balance, which requires a good understanding of the liquid water transport in the PEM fuel cells. In this study, a one-dimensional analytical solution of liquid water transport across the CCL is derived from the fundamental transport equations to investigate the water transport in the CCL of a PEM fuel cell. The effect of CCL wettability on liquid water transport and the effect of excessive liquid water, which is also known as flooding, on reactant transport and cell performance have also been investigated. It has been observed that the wetting characteristic of a CCL plays significant role on the liquid water transport and cell performance. Further, the liquid water saturation in a hydrophilic CCL can be significantly reduced by increasing the surface wettability or lowering the contact angle. Based on a dimensionless time constant analysis, it has been shown that the liquid water production from the phase change process is negligible compared to the production from the electrochemical process. (C) 2010 Professor T. Nejat Veziroglu. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved,

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据