4.7 Article

Study of the influence of the amount of PBI-H3PO4 in the catalytic layer of a high temperature PEMFC

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 35, 期 3, 页码 1347-1355

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.11.091

关键词

High temperature PEMFC; PBI; Phosphoric acid; Performance

资金

  1. JCCM (Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha) [PBI08-151-2045]
  2. CLM-H2 [PBI08-151-2045]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of the amount of polybenzimidazole (PBI)-H3PO4 (normalized with respect to the PBI loading, which expressed as C/PBI weight ratio) content in both the anode and cathode has been studied for a PBI-based high temperature proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell. The electrodes prepared with different amounts of PBI have been characterized physically, by measuring the pore size distribution, and visualizing the surface microstructure. Afterwards, the electrochemical behaviour of the electrodes has been evaluated. The catalytic electrochemical activity has been measured by voltamperometry for each electrode prepared with a different PBI content, and the cell performance results have been studied, supported by the impedance spectra, in order to determine the influence of the PBI loading in each electrode. The best results have been achieved with a C/PBI weight ratio of 20, for both the anode and the cathode. A lower C/PBI weight ratio (larger amount of PBI in the catalytic layer) reduced the electrocatalytic activity, and impaired the mass transport processes, due to the large amount of polymer covering the catalyst particle, lowering the cell performance. A higher C/PBI weight ratio (lower amount of PBI in the catalytic layer) reduced the electrocatalytic activity, and slightly increased the ohmic resistance. The low amount of the polymeric ionic carrier PBI-H3PO4 limited the proton mobility, despite of the presence of large amounts of free H3PO4 in the catalytic layer. (C) 2009 Professor T. Nejat Veziroglu. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据