4.5 Article

Electroosmotic flow through packed beds of granular materials

期刊

MICROFLUIDICS AND NANOFLUIDICS
卷 19, 期 3, 页码 693-708

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10404-015-1594-0

关键词

Electroosmosis; Packed bed; Phenomenological correlation; Buckingham Pi theorem; Capillary interface tracking; Center-of-mass model

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. DuPont Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrical charges originate at most solid surfaces in contact with aqueous electrolytes which result in the formation of an electrical double layer. If an external electric field is tangentially applied to the double layer, an electroosmotic flow is induced which can be employed for various applications such as microfluidic pumps. Here, highly porous materials are especially suitable since they generate significant flow rates along with high pump pressures. The models which are currently used to describe the electroosmotic flow through porous substrates are based on the so-called parallel capillary flow model. In terms of packed beds of granular materials, these models have the disadvantages of oversimplifying the geometry to tortuous capillaries while neglecting intra- and inter-pore connections, varying pore cross-sectional geometries as well as the influence of the packed bed walls. In the current research, we employ dimensional reasoning (Buckingham theorem) to derive a phenomenological model which relates the electroosmotic flow to the averaged parameters of the packed bed as well as to the relevant physicochemical parameters. A comprehensive set of experiments is carried out to infer a semiempirical correlation which can be universally applied to packed beds of arbitrary granular materials. Additionally, we derive a dynamic model of the center-of-mass motion of the fluidic parts of the experimental setup. The model allows for an evaluation of the influence of Joule heating without monitoring the temperature in the bed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据