4.7 Article

Effects of helical GNF on improving the dehydrogenation behavior of LiMg(AlH4)3 and LiAlH4

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 35, 期 5, 页码 2083-2090

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.12.166

关键词

Hydrogen storage; Complex hydrides; Gaphitic nanofibre; Catlysts

资金

  1. Ministry of New and Renewable Energy
  2. University Grants Commission
  3. DST Nano Science Technology Unit (BHU)
  4. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present paper reports the effect of graphitic nanofibres (GNFs) for improving the desorption kinetics of LiMg(AlH4)(3) and LiAlH4 LiMg(AlH4)(3) has been synthesized by mechano-chemical metathesis reaction involving LiAlH4 and MgCl2. The enhancement in dehydrogenation characteristics of LiMg(AlH4)(3) has been shown to be higher when graphitic nanofibres (GNFs) were used as catalyst Out of two different types of nanofibres namely planar graphitic nanofibre (PGNF) and helical graphitic nanofibre (HGNF), the latter has been found to act as better catalyst We observed that helical morphology of fibres improves the desorption kinetics and decreases the desorption temperature of both LiMg(AlH4)(3) and LiAlH4 The desorption temperature for 8 mol% HGNF admixed LiAlH4 gets lowered from 159 degrees C to 128 degrees C with significantly faster kinetics In 8 mol% HGNF admixed LiMg(AlH4)(3) sample, the desorption temperature gets lowered from 105 degrees C to similar to 70 degrees C The activation energy calculated for the first step decomposition of LiAlH4 admixed with 8 mol% HGNF is similar to 68 kJ/mol, where as that for pristine LiAlH4 It IS 107 kJ/mol The activation energy calculated for as synthesized LiMg(AlH4)(3) is similar to 66 kJ/mol Since the first step decomposition of LiMg(AlH4)(3) occurs during GNF admixing, the activation energy for initial step decomposition of GNF admixed LiMg(AlH4)(3) could not be estimated (C) 2009 Professor T. Nejat Veziroglu. Published by Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据