4.7 Article

Co-Magneli phases electrocatalysts for hydrogen/oxygen evolution

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 35, 期 19, 页码 10073-10080

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.07.143

关键词

Magneli phases; Ebonex; Co; Hydrogen evolution; Oxygen evolution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The subject of this work is the use of non-stoichiometric titanium oxides - Magneli phases as support material of Co-based electrocatalysts aimed for hydrogen/oxygen evolution reaction. Commercial micro-scaled Ebonex (Altraverda, UK) was mechanically treated for 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20 h and further Co metallic phase was grafted by sol-gel method. Morphology of Co/Ebonex electrocatalysts was observed by means of TEM and SEM microscopy, while electrochemical behavior by means of cyclic voltammetry and steady-state galvanostatic method. As the duration of mechanical treatment increases, the size of Magneli phases decreases, and consequently catalytic activity of the corresponding electrocatalysts increases. Structural characteristics of the electrocatalysts deposited on Ebonex treated for 16 and 20 h are very similar. Also, these electrocatalysts show similar electrocatalytic activity for both hydrogen and oxygen evolution reaction. So, optimal duration of mechanical treatment of Magneli phases is in the range of 16-20 h. Catalytic activity for hydrogen evolution of the studied electrocatalysts is inferior related to the corresponding catalysts deposited on carbonaceous support materials such as activated multiwalled carbon nanotubes or Vulcan XC-72 + TiO2 (anatase). This inferiority is due to lower real surface area of the Magneli phases. Catalytic behavior for oxygen evolution achieves its maximal value even at the catalyst deposited on Ebonex treated for 12 h and it is very promising related to the similar electrocatalytic system such as CoPt/Ebonex. (C) 2010 Professor T. Nejat Veziroglu. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据