4.7 Article

Sodium inhibition of fermentatlive hydrogen production

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 34, 期 8, 页码 3295-3304

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.02.051

关键词

Fermentative hydrogen production; Sodium inhibition; Acute toxicity; Chronic toxicity; Acclimation

资金

  1. National Research Laboratory Program [MI-0203-00-0063]
  2. Korean Ministry of Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A continuous-stirred-tank reactor (CSTR) was fed with low-sodium influent containing 0.27 g of Na+/L for 70 days (Phase 1), and then subjected to higher concentrations of Na+/L, i.e. 2.41 (Phase II), 5.36 (Phase III), and 10.14 g (Phase IV-1). At the quasi-steady state of each phase, biomass was sampled for an acute sodium toxicity assay. Unlike the control biomass, which exhibited a monotonic decrease of specific H-2 production activity (SHPA) with increasing sodium concentration from 0.27 to 21.00 g Na+/L, the acclimated biomass maintained their activity up to 6.00 g Na+/L. Soluble microbial product analysis revealed that a sudden increase of the exterior sodium concentration changed the metabolic pathway such that it became favorable to lactate production while depressing butyrate production. Meanwhile, when the biomass was allowed for sufficient time to adapt to the chronic toxicity condition, the volumetric H-2 production rate (VHPR) was maintained above 4.05 L H-2/L/d at up to Phase III. However, an irrecoverable H-2 production drop was observed at Phase IV-1 with a significant increase of lactate and propionate production. Although the sodium concentration decreased to 8.12 (Phase IV-2), 6.61 (Phase IV-3), and 5.36 g Na+/L (Phase V) at further operation, the performance was never recovered. A PCR-DGGE analysis revealed that lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and propionic acid bacteria (PAB) were only detected at Phases IV and V, which are not capable of producing H-2. (C) 2009 International Association for Hydrogen Energy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据