4.7 Article

Visible light active pristine and Fe3+ doped CuGa2O4 spinel photocatalysts for solar hydrogen production

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 33, 期 11, 页码 2646-2652

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.03.018

关键词

spinels; photocatalyst; H2S decomposition; hydrogen production

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spinel metal oxide photocatalysts, a rarely studied group in visible light driven photocatalytic decomposition of H2S and solar H-2 production, have been investigated in the present work. d(10) p-block element, Ga containing spinel CuGa2O4 in pristine and Fe3+ doped (CuGa2-xFexO4, x = 0.6) states, was prepared by ceramic route without/with noble metal oxide, NiO/RuO2 loading to the extent of 1 wt%. XRD analysis reveals a single-phase cubic spinel crystalline structure for all the catalysts. FESEM displays an irregular-shaped grain morphology for CuGa2O4 and smaller size almost cubic particles for CuGa2-xFexO4. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy suggests a chemical composition consistent with the stoichiometric molecular formula. Optically, the catalysts display an intensive light absorption in UV and visible regions with an onset at about 900 nm in the near IR region. Fe3+ doping constructively influences the morphology and optical properties of pristine CuGa2O4. All these physico-chemical and material characteristics infuse a facile catalytic function into the prepared spinel oxides such that the naked CuGa2O4 and CuGa2-xFexO4 spinels exhibit a moderate to fairly good photocatalytic activity while the cocatalyst-loaded CuGa2-xFexO4 spinel performs an exceedingly good photocatalytic activity with 15% quantum efficiency Thus, the present work leads to the emergence of functionally high performance, stable and visible active (lambda >= 420nm) photocatalysts in the spinel group for the production of solar hydrogen from H2S. (c) 2008 International Association for Hydrogen Energy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据