4.7 Article

Enhancement of photocatalytic hydrogen production rate using photosensitized Tio2/RuO2-MV2+

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 33, 期 13, 页码 3264-3269

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.04.027

关键词

photocatalytic; semiconductors; photosensitizers; hydrogen production

资金

  1. US-Egypt Science and Technology joint Fund Program
  2. US National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Construction of an efficient system for light energy conversion into chemical energy is one of the most important subjects from the viewpoint of solar light energy utilization. Photocatalytic hydrogen production is a promising process for solar energy conversion and storage. As a strategy for effective visible light harvest, spectra sensitization of wide bandgap semiconductors by dye molecules has been studied for photocatalytic H-2 production from water. In the present investigation, coupling of an inorganic semiconductor (modified titanium dioxide) with suitable photo sensitizers has been studied for photocatalytic hydrogen production. Copper phthalocyanine, ruthenium bipyridyl, and Eosin Y, as photosensitizers were used for hydrogen production using UV/solar radiation. The under-test photosensitizers were added to Slurry of TiO2/RuO2 semiconductor containing methyl viologen (MV2+) as an electron relay. it was found that, with sensitized modified titanium dioxide, there is a higher amount of produced hydrogen than with the naked modified titanium dioxide specially in case of using solar energy radiation. Among the under-test photosensitizers, copper phthalocyanine exhibited higher efficiencies compared with other sensitizers. The effect of changing pH on the above system was studied. Suitable mechanisms have been proposed, in accordance with the observations, for the different kinds of catalytic systems employed in the present study. (C) 2008 International Association for Hydrogen Energy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据