4.7 Article

Synthesis and characterization of bimetallic Cu-Ni/ZrO2 nanocatalysts: H2 production by oxidative steam reforming of methanol

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 33, 期 17, 页码 4569-4576

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.06.019

关键词

Cu-Ni/ZrO2 catalysts; Bimetallic nanocatalysts; H-2 production; Oxidative steam reforming of methanol; HRTEM; STEM-EDX; TPR

资金

  1. [ININ-CA-711]
  2. [CONACYT J-48924]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cu/ZrO2, Ni/ZrO2 and bimetallic Cu-Ni/ZrO2 catalysts were prepared by deposition-precipitation method to produce hydrogen by oxidative steam reforming of methanol (OSRM) reaction in the range of 250-360 degrees C. TPR analysis of the Cu-Ni/ZrO2 catalyst showed that the presence of Cu facilitates the reduction of the Ni at lower temperatures. In addition, this sample showed two reduction peaks, the former peak was attributed to the reduction of the adjacent Cu and Ni atoms which could be forming a bimetallic Cu-rich phase, and the second was assigned to the remaining Ni atoms forming bimetallic Ni-rich nanoparticles. Transmission Electron Microscopy revealed Cu or Ni nanoparticles on the monometallic samples, while bimetallic nanoparticles were identified on the Cu-Ni/ZrO2 catalyst. On the other hand, Cu-Ni/ZrO2 catalyst exhibited better catalytic activity than the monometallic samples. The difference between them was related to the Cu-Ni nanoparticles present on the former catalyst, as well as the bifunctional role of the bimetallic phase and the support that improve the catalytic activity. All the catalysts showed the same selectivity toward H-2 at the maximum reaction temperature and it was similar to 60%. The high selectivity toward CO is associated to the presence of the bimetallic Ni-rich nanoparticles, as evidenced by TEM-EDX analysis, since this behavior is similar to the one showed by the monometallic Ni-catalyst. (C) 2008 International Association for Hydrogen Energy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据