4.7 Article

Characterization of capillary performance of composite wicks for two-phase heat transfer devices

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.09.002

关键词

Two-phase heat transfer devices; Heat pipes; Composite wick; Capillary performance; Permeability; Capillary rise; Infrared thermal imaging

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China-Guangdong Joint Funds [U0834002]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [51275180]
  3. PhD Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [20100172120001]
  4. China Scholarship Council [2011615063]
  5. South China University of Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A composite wick by covering a layer of sintered copper powder on micro V-grooves was developed for two-phase heat transfer devices. Capillary performance of the composite wicks, which integrates both permeability and capillary pressure, was experimentally examined by comparing with normal sintered and grooved wicks. Forced liquid flow tests with deionized water were conducted to determine the permeability. Using a novel infrared (IR) thermal imaging method, the capillary rate-of-rise tests with ethanol were carried out to characterize the capillary performance of wicks. Two kinds of powder with spherical and irregular shapes, and four different particle size of <50, 50-75,75-110 and 110-150 mu m were evaluated for the purpose of design optimization. Tests results show that the composite wicks enhanced both the permeability and capillary performance compared to the sintered wicks, and exhibited much larger capillary pressure than the grooved wicks. The permeability and capillary performance of composite wicks increased monotonically with the powder size, whereas the capillary pressure did not follow this order. The feasibility of the well-known Washburn's equation in characterizing the capillary rate-or-rise processes was also assessed. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据