4.7 Article

A study of nucleate boiling heat transfer on hydrophilic, hydrophobic and heterogeneous wetting surfaces

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER
卷 54, 期 25-26, 页码 5643-5652

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2011.06.001

关键词

Nucleate boiling heat transfer; Surface wettability; Bubble dynamics

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST) [R31 - 30005, MZ0706000050-08M0600-05010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of characteristic of heating surface on nucleate boiling heat transfer is well reported via many previous results. However, until recently, the study of surface influences on nucleate boiling was complicated by coupled surface factors; wettability and surface roughness. This study focuses on nucleate pool boiling under different wetting conditions, in the absence of microscale roughness, which is coupled with wetting phenomena. Heterogeneous boiling occurs on hydrophilic (54) and hydrophobic (123) surfaces, even without microstructures that can trap water vapor. In the very low heat flux regime, hydrophobic surfaces offer better nucleate boiling heat transfer than hydrophilic surfaces. Moreover, a heterogeneous wettability surface composed of hydrophobic dots on a hydrophilic surface provides better nucleate boiling heat transfer than a homogeneous wettability surface (hydrophilic or hydrophobic). Analysis of bubble generation and departure was carried out via a high-speed visualization technique in order to understand these experimental results. Based on the bubble analysis, it was inferred that changes in wettability could lead to totally different boiling performance when microstructures are absent. Also, the number of hydrophobic dots and the pitch distance between dots were key parameters for explaining boiling performance under heterogeneous wetting conditions. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据