4.5 Article

Experimental study of air natural convection on metallic foam-sintered plate

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2012.08.005

关键词

Metallic foam; Natural convection; Inclination; Heat-transfer rate; Empirical correlation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51176149]
  2. National Key Projects of Fundamental R/D of China (973 Project) [2011CB610306]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The natural convection on metallic foam-sintered plate at different inclination angles was experimentally studied. Seven copper foam samples with different pore densities (10-40 pore per inch), porosities (0.90-0.95), and aspect ratios (the ratio of foam thickness to sample length, 0.1-0.5) were measured at inclination angles of 0 degrees (vertical orientation), 15 degrees, 30 degrees, 45 degrees, 60 degrees, 75 degrees, 90 degrees (horizontal orientation). The heat conduction and natural convection inside the foam both contributed to the total heat transfer. Although, the form and viscous drag, which are influenced by permeability and viscous friction in the thermal boundary layer respectively, tend to suppress the natural convection, the heat transfer was finally enhanced by the foam sintered surface due to large surface area extension. Optimum inclination range 60-75 degrees corresponding to maximum average Nu number was found in the heat flux range of 600-1800 W/m(2). The sintered foam surface with lower porosity and pore density was recommended for heat transfer enhancement. Particularly, the sample with porosity 0.9, pore density of 10 PPI, aspect ratio of 0.5 offered the highest average Nu number among the studied samples. An empirical correlation for modified Nusselt number at isoflux boundary condition considering the foam morphology parameter and inclination angle was proposed within deviation +/- 15% between the correlation and the experimental data. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据