4.7 Article

Microbial glucose biosensors based on glassy carbon paste electrodes modified with Gluconobacter Oxydans and graphene oxide or graphene-platinum hybrid nanoparticles

期刊

MICROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 183, 期 1, 页码 73-81

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-015-1590-9

关键词

Graphene oxide; Graphene-platinum hybrid nanoparticles; Gluconobacter oxydans; Nanomaterials; Microbial biosensor

资金

  1. Mugla Sitki Kocman University BAP Project [13 / 17]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have performed a study on the performance of two microbial glucose sensors based on immobilized Gluconobacter oxydans (G. oxydans). The first one was prepared by modifying a glassy carbon paste electrode (GCPE) containing the microbial cells with graphene oxide (GO), the other one by modifying it with graphene-platinum hybrid nanoparticles (graphene-Pt NPs). The electrode was characterized by following the voltammetric signals of the oxidation of hexacyanoferrate(II) to hexacyanoferrate(III) via the oxidative enzymes contained in G. oxydans which convert glucose to gluconic acid. Optimizations were conducted with a conventional GCPE containing G. oxydans. After material optimization, the biosensors were applied to the determination of glucose. The linear and analytical ranges for GO based biosensor range from 1 to 75 mu M (linear) and 1 to 100 mu M (analytical), respectively, with a limit of detection (LOD) of (3 s/m) 1.06 mu M (at an S/m of 3). On the other hand, the graphene-Pt hybrid nanoparticle based biosensor showed two linear ranges (from 0.3 to 1 A mu M and from 1 to 10 mu M), a full analytical range from 1 to 50 mu M, and an LOD of 0.015 mu M. The graphene-Pt hybrid NP based sensors performs better and was applied to the determination of glucose in synthetically prepared plasma samples where it gave recoveries as 101.8 and 104.37 % for two different concentrations. Selectivity studies concerning fructose, galactose, L-ascorbic acid and dopamine were also conducted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据