4.7 Article

Hybrid nanoparticles based on magnetic multiwalled carbon nanotube-nanoC18SiO2 composites for solid phase extraction of mycotoxins prior to their determination by LC-MS

期刊

MICROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 183, 期 2, 页码 871-880

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-015-1722-2

关键词

Magnetic solid phase extraction; Liquid chromatography; Mass spectrometry; Macrocyclic lactone mycotoxins; Maize analysis; Transmission electron microscopy; Silica nanopowder

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) [CTQ2013-48411-P]
  2. JJCC Castilla-La Mancha [JCCM PEIC-2014-001-P]
  3. INCRECYT research contract

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The preparation of magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) coated with a layer of octadecyl group-modified silica containing multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) is described. Synthesis was accomplished by in-situ high temperature decomposition of the precursors ferric ion, octadecyltrichlorosilane (C-18) and MWCNTs in ethylene glycol solvent. Transmission electron microscopy confirmed that the MNPs are encapsulated in the composite silica coating. These MNPs were used for clean-up of maize samples and the preconcentration of zearalenone and its secondary metabolites, namely beta-zearalenol, beta-zearalanol, alpha-zearalenol, alpha-zearalanol, and zearalanone at trace levels, prior to their determination by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. A comparative study of analyte adsorption and desorption was conducted with MNPs prepared with and without C-18 and showed both solid phases to adsorb the analytes to some extent, but higher recoveries were obtained by using the C-18-modified MNPs which therefore was selected for extraction of the mycotoxins. Under the optimum conditions, the MNPs can be re-used 6 times at least without loss of their extraction efficiency. Preconcentration factors are similar to 25, detection limits range from 0.6 to 1.0 mu g mL(-1), recoveries from spiked samples from 91.6 to 98.3 %, and relative standard deviations are < 3.9 %.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据