期刊
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS
卷 118, 期 1, 页码 1-3出版社
ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.03.005
关键词
Cesarean delivery; Critical care obstetrics; Labor management; Pull method; Push method
Objective: To compare the morbidity and mortality of 2 current techniques during cesarean delivery of an impacted fetal head. Methods: In a comparative setting, 59 pregnant women with obstructed labor due to impacted fetal head were recruited. The patients were categorized into 2 groups according to method of extraction: the push group (n = 30) and the pull group (n = 29). Uterus relaxants were used before cesarean in all cases and the incision was higher and wider than routine. Maternal and neonatal morbidities were compared between the groups. Results: Maternal complications in the push and pull groups were extension of the uterine incision (15 [50.0%] vs 5 [17.2%]); T or J incision (3 [10.0%] vs 4[13.8%]); blood transfusion (3 [10.0%] vs 1 [3.4%]); wound infection (4 [13.3%] vs 1 [3.4%]); fever (16 [53.3%] vs 3 [10.3%]); and urinary tract infection (10 [33.3%] vs 0 [0.0%]). Incidences of extension of the uterine incision, fever, and urinary tract infection were significantly higher in the push group (P=0.008). Conclusion: Owing to a lower rate of abnormal incision and postpartum fever/infection with the pull method, this technique is preferable to the push method. (C) 2012 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据