4.5 Review

Aggressive Behavior and Poor Prognosis of Endometrial Stromal Sarcomas With YWHAE-FAM22 Rearrangement Indicate the Clinical Importance to Recognize This Subset

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER
卷 24, 期 9, 页码 1616-1622

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000278

关键词

ESS; Uterus; YWHAE-NUTM2 (FAM22) rearrangement; Classification; Review

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Although the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2003 defined endometrial stromal sarcomas (ESSs) in general have a good prognosis, considerable differences in clinical behavior and prognosis may exist between different patients with ESS. The ESSs of the type associated with YWHAE-NUTM2 (previously named YWHAE-FAM22) fusion have a more aggressive clinical behavior and poorer prognosis than conventional ESS. Recently, the WHO 2014 classification recognizes this subset of ESS as a separate entity and classifies these as high-grade ESSs. Recognition of this subset has therefore an important clinical impact. We performed a review of the literature to delineate the clinicopathologic features of ESS patients with anYWHAE-NUTM2 rearrangement, with the goal to recognize this subset of ESS. Methods: We report a case of a woman with WHO 2014-defined high-grade ESS. Furthermore, published English literature was reviewed for YWHAE-FAM22 ESS and uterus. Results: Twenty patients were identified, with a median age of 50 (range, 28-67) years. There were no clinical features able to recognize YWHAE-NUTM2 ESS. However, they characteristically contain specific histopathological features. Furthermore, YWHAE-NUTM2 ESSs are strongly cyclin D1 positive in contrast to conventional low-grade ESSs. Conclusions: YWHAE-NUTM2 ESSs represent a subset of ESSs with an aggressive clinical behavior and poor prognosis. Specific histopathological features may indicate the presence of YWHAE-NUTM2 rearrangement, which subsequently can be confirmed by cyclin D1 immunostaining.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据