4.5 Article

GALR1 Methylation in Vaginal Swabs Is Highly Accurate in Identifying Women With Endometrial Cancer

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER
卷 23, 期 6, 页码 1050-1055

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e3182959103

关键词

Epigenetics; DNA methylation; Endometrial cancer; Vaginal swab; Postmenopausal bleeding

资金

  1. Eve Appeal
  2. UCLH/UCL Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre project
  3. NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme
  4. Department of Health NIHR Biomedical Research Centres (BRC)
  5. EGA
  6. Helse Vest
  7. Research Council of Norway
  8. Norwegian Cancer Society (Harald Andersens legat)
  9. European Network Translational Research in Gynaecological Oncology (ENTRIGO)
  10. European Network of Individualized Treatment of Endometrial Cancer of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Endometrial cancer has become the most common gynecological cancer in developed countries. Postmenopausal bleeding is indicative of the disease in only 1 of 10 women with this symptom. A noninvasive tool to identify women with cancer would be highly desirable. We analyzed more than 27,000 CpGs in normal endometrial tissue (n = 23) and endometrial cancers (n = 64) and found that DNA methylation of GALR1 is among the most frequent epigenetic alterations in this cancer. We then developed a real-time polymerase chain reaction-based GALR1 methylation test and applied this test to vaginal swabs from 79 women who presented with postmenopausal bleeding. The receiver operating characteristics area under the curve, describing sensitivity and specificity to correctly identify the 41 women with both premalignant and malignant endometrial changes, was 0.93 (95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.97; P < 0.0001). GALR1 DNA methylation is one of the most common molecular alterations in endometrial cancer, and the presence of GALR1 methylation in vaginal swabs from women with postmenopausal bleeding indicates the presence of endometrial malignancy with a sensitivity of 92.7% and a specificity of 78.9%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据