4.5 Review

Clinical Trials in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

期刊

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e31821bb8aa

关键词

Ovarian cancer; Recurrent; Clinical trials

资金

  1. Astra Zeneca
  2. Roche
  3. GlaxoSmithKline
  4. Pharmamar
  5. Ortho Biotech
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim
  7. Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute
  8. Ovarian Cancer Canada
  9. National Cancer Institute (US)
  10. Taiho
  11. Merck
  12. Pfizer
  13. Amgen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The 4th Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference of the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup was held in Vancouver, Canada, in June 2010. Representatives of 23 cooperative research groups studying gynecologic cancers gathered to establish international consensus on issues critical to the conduct of large randomized trials. Group C, 1 of the 3 discussion groups, examined recurrent ovarian cancer, and we report the consensus reached regarding 4 questions. These included the following: (1) What is the role of cytoreductive surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer? (2) How do we define distinct patient populations in need of specific therapeutic approaches? (3) Should end points for trials with recurrent disease vary from those of first-line trials? (4) Is CA-125 progression alone sufficient for entry/eligibility into clinical trials?

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据