4.6 Article

Insights into silicate carbonation processes in water-bearing supercritical CO2 fluids

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.02.005

关键词

Supercritical CO2; Silicate carbonation; Carbon sequestration; Calcite

资金

  1. Carbon Sequestration Initiative, a Laboratory Directed Research and Development program at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)
  2. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Fossil Energy
  3. DOE by Battelle Memorial Institute [DE-AC06-76RLO-1830]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Subsurface injection of CO2 is commonplace in certain industries, yet deployment at the scale required for emission reduction is unprecedented and therefore requires a high degree of predictability. Accurate modeling of subsurface geochemical processes related to geologic carbon sequestration requires experimentally derived data for mineral reactions. Most work in this area has focused on aqueous-dominated systems in which dissolved CO2 reacts to form crystalline carbonate minerals. Comparatively little laboratory research has been conducted on reactions occurring between minerals in the host rock and the wet supercritical fluid phase. We studied the carbonation of wollastonite [CaSiO3] exposed to variably hydrated supercritical CO2 (scCO(2)) at 50, 55 and 70 degrees C and 90, 120 and 160 bar. Reactions were followed by three novel in situ high pressure techniques, which demonstrated increased dissolved water concentrations in the scCO(2) resulted in increased wollastonite carbonation approaching similar to 50 wt.%. Overall, the X-ray diffraction and infrared and magic angle nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopies experiments conducted in this study allow detailed examination of mechanisms impacting carbonation rates. These include the development of amorphous passivating layers, thin liquid water films, and amorphous hydrated carbonate phases. Collectively, these results emphasize the importance of understanding geochemical processes occurring in wet scCO(2) fluids. (c) 2013 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据