4.6 Article

Comparison of two electrolyte models for the carbon capture with aqueous ammonia

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.02.002

关键词

CO2 capture; Thermodynamic model; Aqueous ammonia; Chilled ammonia; Extended UNIQUAC; eNRTL; Aspen Plus; Process simulation

资金

  1. Danish ministry of science technology and innovation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Post-combustion carbon capture is attracting much attention due to the fact that it can be retrofitted on existing coal power plants. Among the most interesting technologies is the one that employs aqueous ammonia solutions to absorb the generated carbon dioxide. The evaluation of such process requires the modeling of electrolyte solutions. In this work two thermodynamic models for electrolyte solutions are compared against each other with respect to experimental data. They are the e-NRTL model and the Extended UNIQUAC model, both implemented in the commercial software Aspen Plus (R)(1) (version 7.2). Subsequently, a simple absorption/regeneration layout is simulated employing both models and the process performances are compared. In general, the Extended UNIQUAC appears to describe the experimental data for larger ranges of temperature, pressure and concentration of ammonia more satisfactorily. The energy performances computed with the Extended UNIQUAC models are less promising than with the e-NRTL model. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据