4.6 Article

Geomechanical analysis of the Naylor Field, Otway Basin, Australia: Implications for CO2 injection and storage

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.06.001

关键词

Otway Basin Australia; In situ stress; Reservoir stress path; Fault stability

资金

  1. Commonwealth of Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A geomechanical assessment of the Naylor Field, Otway Basin, Australia has been undertaken to investigate the possible geomechanical effects of CO2 injection and storage. The study aims to evaluate the geomechanical behaviour of the caprock/reservoir system and to estimate the risk of fault reactivation. The stress regime in the onshore Victorian Otway Basin is inferred to be strike-slip if the maximum horizontal stress is calculated using frictional limits and DITF (drilling induced tensile fracture) occurrence, or normal if maximum horizontal stress is based on analysis of dipole sonic log data. The NW-SE maximum horizontal stress orientation (142 degrees N) determined from a resistivity image log is broadly consistent with previous estimates and confirms a NW-SE maximum horizontal stress orientation for the Otway Basin. An analytical geomechanical solution is used to describe stress changes in the subsurface of the Naylor Field. The computed reservoir stress path for the Naylor Field is then incorporated into fault reactivation analysis to estimate the minimum pore pressure increase required to cause fault reactivation (Delta P-p). The highest reactivation propensity (for critically-oriented faults) ranges from an estimated pore pressure increase (Delta P-p) of 1 MPa to 15.7 MPa (estimated pore pressure of 18.5-33.2 MPa) depending on assumptions made about maximum horizontal stress magnitude, fault strength, reservoir stress path and Blot's coefficient. The critical pore pressure changes for known faults at Naylor Field range from an estimated pore pressure increase (Delta P-p) of 2 MPa to 17 MPa (estimated pore pressure of 19.5-34.5 MPa). (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据