4.0 Article

Association Between Sleep Duration and Health Outcome in Elderly Taiwanese

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY
卷 5, 期 4, 页码 200-205

出版社

ELSEVIER TAIWAN
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijge.2011.09.020

关键词

health outcome; National survey on knowledge, attitude, and practice of health promotion; sleep duration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The aim was to assess the relationship between sleep duration and self-rated health outcome in the elderly Taiwanese. Methods: The data were drawn from the National Survey on Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Health Promotion 2002 (HPKAP 2002) in Taiwan. Three thousand seven hundred and thirty-one elderly participants (>= 65 years of age) completed this survey, including 1955 men (52.4%) and 1776 women (47.6%). The anonymous questionnaire collected information on demographic data, sleep duration, health status, and health behaviors. After adjusting for various risk factors, a multiple logistic regression model was applied to compare the participants sleeping an average of 6 to 8 hours/night with those sleeping <= 5 hours and >= 9 hours. Results: A U-shaped relationship was found in elderly participants, with both short and long sleep durations and a higher risk of poor health perception (<= 5 hours/night: OR = 1.13, 95% CI 0.93-1.36; >= 9 hours/night: OR = 1.30, 95% CI 1.01-1.75), depression (<= 5 hours/night: OR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.02-1.86), chronic diseases (especially heart disease and limited activity), and unhealthy habits (>= 9 hours/night: smoking - OR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.02-1.46; no exercise - OR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.17-1.97). Conclusion: A U-shaped relationship was observed between the self-reported sleep duration with risk prevalence and health outcome in the elderly population, although not all results showed a significant difference. A progressively higher change was observed during short and long sleep durations in our study. Copyright (c) 2011, Taiwan Society of Geriatric Emergency & Critical Care Medicine. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据