4.5 Article

The efficacy of plasma biomarkers in early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/gps.4053

关键词

amnesia mild cognitive impairment; Alzheimer's disease; plasma; biomarkers

资金

  1. Shanghai Science and Technology Committee [08411951100, 10ZR1425800]
  2. China Ministry of Science and Technology [2009BAI77B03, 2012ZX09303]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81201030]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundEarly diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is imperative for the prevention of disease progression and the development of effective treatments. ObjectiveClinically, AD diagnosis has been based on adherence to clinical criteria. It has recently been proposed that diagnostic criteria should also incorporate biomarker findings. However, the most studied candidates or group of candidates for AD biomarkers, including pathological processes and proteins, needs further research. The current study aimed to investigate the capabilities of the following plasma proteins in the diagnosis of AD and amnesia mild cognitive impairment (aMCI): peripheral interleukin (IL) 10, IL-6, amyloid- (A) 40, A42, phosphorylated tau 181, and total tau. MethodsIn addition to 122 normal control (NC) group, 97AD patients and 54 aMCI patients were recruited for this study. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to analyze the concentration of the following blood plasma biomarkers: IL-10, IL-6, A40, A42, phosphorylated tau 181, and total tau. ResultsA one-way analysis of variance (one-factor analysis of variance) of A40 and IL-10 levels revealed a statistically significant difference between the three groups (p<0.001 and p=0.020). Using A4042.70pg/ml as the cut-off point, the sensitivity of the ability of A40 to discriminate between AD and NC groups was 80.0%, and specificity was 69.6%. ConclusionsThe plasma A40 biomarker was able to distinguish between AD and NC groups. However, the plasma biomarkers in the present research were not able to distinguish between aMCI and NC groups. Copyright (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据