4.5 Article

Chronic endurance exercise training prevents aging-related cognitive decline in healthy older adults: a randomized controlled trial

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY
卷 25, 期 10, 页码 1055-1064

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/gps.2462

关键词

endurance exercise training; cognitive decline; elderly; Mini Mental State Examination; randomized controlled trial

资金

  1. Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio in Bologna

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate the effects of endurance exercise training (EET) on the cognitive status of healthy community-dwelling older adults. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted involving community-dwelling older adults from the town of Pianoro (northern Italy). We randomized 120 healthy subjects aged 65-74 years, both genders, to treatment (N = 60) and control (N = 60) groups. The treatment consisted of 12 months of supervised EET in a community gym, 3 h a week. All participants were assessed both at baseline and after 12 months on an intention-to-treat analysis. Cognitive status was assessed by one single test (Mini Mental State Examination, MMSE). Anthropometric indexes, routine laboratory measurements and C-reactive protein (CRP) were also assessed. Results: The control group showed a significant decrease in MMSE score (mean difference -1.21,95% CI -1.83/-0.60, p = 0.0002), which differed significantly (p = 0.02) from the treatment group scores (-0.21, 95% CI -0.79/0.37, p = 0.47). The odds ratio for the treated older adults to have a stable cognitive status after 1 year, as compared to the control group, was 2.74 (95% Cl 1.16/6.48) after adjustment for age, gender, educational level and several other possible confounders. Blood pressure, body mass index, waist circumference and serum cholesterol did not differ significantly between the two groups, while CRP decreased only in the treatment group. Conclusions: A 12-month EET intervention may reduce the progression of age-related cognitive decline in healthy older adults. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据