4.3 Article

Varietal Comparison of The Chemical, Physical, and Mechanical Properties of Five Colored Table Grapes

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD PROPERTIES
卷 16, 期 3, 页码 598-612

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10942912.2011.558231

关键词

Table grapes; Texture analysis; Texture profile analysis; Skin hardness; Color index; Anthocyanins

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The visual attributes of table grapes, their chemical constituents, and mechanical properties are involved in consumer acceptability because they are correlated to sensory perception. Usually, instrumental measurements are preferred to the sensory evaluations because they reduce variations in subjective judgments and can be carried out more easily. In this work, chemical-physical attributes and texture properties of five black table grapes (Alphonse Lavallee, Black magic, Cardinal, Perlon, Regina nera) were studied in order to identify significant varietal differences. Spectrophotometric and HPLC methods and texture analysis test were used to evaluate color index, sugars and acid composition, phenolic characteristics, and mechanical properties of the skin and the pulp of berries. Many differences were found among varieties in technological maturity indexes, hydroxycinnamic acid, anthocyanin content and profile, and relative CIE L*, a*, b* parameters, but the more relevant differences were found in mechanical properties. Principal component analysis showed that the texture profile analysis parameters (hardness, cohesiveness, gumminess, and resilience) and berry skin characteristics (break skin energy, skin modulus of elasticy) were the best indices able to fulfill the aim of this work. Almost all of the parameters showed differences among cultivars, confirming their importance in the characterization of the variety as well as in the assessment of potential consumer acceptability. In particular, the cultivars demonstrated different reactions to the compression test; thus, the texture analysis parameters can be appropriate to explain varietal differences and to allow their differentiation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据