4.3 Article

COMPARISON BETWEEN WATER VAPOR SORPTION ISOTHERMS OBTAINED USING THE NEW DYNAMIC DEWPOINT ISOTHERM METHOD AND THOSE OBTAINED USING THE STANDARD SATURATED SALT SLURRY METHOD

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD PROPERTIES
卷 15, 期 1-2, 页码 236-248

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10942911003778014

关键词

Isotherm; Water activity; Saturated salt slurries; Dynamic Dewpoint isotherm; AquaSorp Isotherm Generator

资金

  1. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [385]
  2. Institute of Food Technologists
  3. Midwest Advanced Food Manufacturing Alliance (University of Nebraska-Lincoln)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Dynamic Dewpoint isotherm method directly determines sample a(w) using chilled-mirror technology, while changes in sample weight are tracked gravimetrically. The objective of this research was to compare the Dynamic Dewpoint isotherms to saturated salt slurry isotherms for five materials: dent corn starch, isolated soy protein, microcrystalline cellulose, crystalline sucrose, and corn flakes. The Dynamic Dewpoint isotherms were obtained using the AquaSorp Isotherm Generator between 0.10 and 0.95 a(w) at 25 degrees C. Comparison working isotherms were obtained using 12 saturated salt slurries, between 0.064 and 0.973 a(w) in desiccators and proximity equilibration cells at 25 degrees C. The Dynamic Dewpoint isotherms exhibited similar sorption behavior to the saturated salt slurry isotherms, except for corn flakes, where there was a marked decrease in moisture content compared to the saturated salt slurry isotherms between 0.40 and 0.70 a(w). This difference was attributed to the slow diffusion of water into the very dense laminated corn flake matrix, highlighting the rate of sorption (lime) dependency of the Dynamic Dewpoint isotherm method. The Dynamic Dewpoint isotherm method offers the opportunity for real-time investigation of water sorption-related material properties, such as the glass to rubbery transition, recrystallization, hydrate formation, and deliquescence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据