4.7 Article

Development of a novel antimicrobial film based on chitosan with LAE (ethyl-Nα-dodecanoyl-L-arginate) and its application to fresh chicken

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
卷 165, 期 3, 页码 339-345

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.06.003

关键词

Chitosan films; LAE; Antimicrobial packaging; Active packaging; Antimicrobial release; Poultry packaging

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [AGL2009-08776, AGL2012-39920-CO3-01]
  2. EU [212544]
  3. CSIC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chitosan (CS) films incorporating the antimicrobial compound ethyl-N-alpha-dodecanoyl-L-arginate (LAE) were developed for food packaging applications. Cast chitosan films were made with 1, 5 or 10% LAE and 20% glycerol in the film forming solution. Optical properties, release of LAE and antimicrobial activity of developed films was determined, The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and the minimum biocide concentration (MBC) of LAE were determined. CS films with LAE were transparent and uniform, without discontinuities or visible particles and no visual differences could be perceived between CS and CS-LAE films. When in contact with an aqueous food simulant, the agent was fully released following a Fickian behavior in a few hours at 4 and 28 T. Antimicrobial activity of films against mesophiles, psychrophiles, Pseudomonas spp., colifoms, lactic acid bacteria, hydrogen sulfide-producing bacteria, yeast and fungi, was evaluated at two, six and eight days for its application on chicken breast fillets. Films were active against bacteria, yeasts and fungi in liquid and solid media. CS films evidenced antimicrobial activity in the range 0.47-2.96 log reductions, while CS-5%LAE film produced 1.78-5.81 log reduction. Results highlighted that LAE incorporation in a chitosan-based packaging structure may provide a relevant antimicrobial activity that could improve the stability of fresh poultry products. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据