4.7 Article

Development of an antimicrobial sachet containing encapsulated allyl isothiocyanate to inactivate Escherichia coli O157:H7 on spinach leaves

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
卷 159, 期 2, 页码 136-143

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.08.009

关键词

Antimicrobial packaging; Allyl isothiocyanate; Spinach; Escherichia coli O157:H7

资金

  1. Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea [PJ007387]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A sachet releasing allyl isothiocyanate (AIT) vapor was developed and its effectiveness as an antimicrobial packaging system for fresh spinach was evaluated. AIT was encapsulated in calcium alginate beads (AIT beads) and the release of AIT as affected by temperature and relative humidity (RH) was determined. The release rate of AIT from beads increased with increased temperature, but was not significantly affected by RH. A low-density polyethylene (LDPE) sachet containing AIT beads (Air sachet) was prepared and the rate of release of AIT as affected by film thickness and temperature was studied. The release of AIT from sachets increased significantly with decreased LDPE thickness and increased temperature. Finally, antimicrobial effects of the AIT sachet against Escherichia coli 0157:H7 and molds and yeasts (MY) on fresh spinach leaves were determined. E. coli 0157:H7 and MY had similar sensitivities to Art vapor. The number of E. coli 0157:H7 on spinach leaves (5.6 log CFU/leaf) decreased by 1.6-2.6 log CFU/leaf at 4 degrees C and 2.1-5.7 log CFU/leaf at 25 degrees C within 5 days. The reduction of E. coli 0157:H7 was significantly greater at 85% RH than at 43% RH. Reductions on control leaves (no AIT sachet) did not exceed 1.2 log CFU/leaf under any of the test conditions. Results of the study will be useful when developing antimicrobial packaging systems to increase the microbiological safety and extend the shelf life of spinach and possibly other fresh produces. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据