4.7 Article

Certain dietary carbohydrates promote Listeria infection in a guinea pig model, while others prevent it

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
卷 140, 期 2-3, 页码 218-224

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.03.030

关键词

Listeria monocytogenes; Prebiotic; Guinea pig; Prevention of infection

资金

  1. Danish Council for Strategic Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It has been proposed that dietary non-digestible carbohydrates can improve host resistance to intestinal infections by stimulating health-promoting bacteria in the gut. However, evidence from in vivo infection studies is scarce, particularly for gram-positive infections. We studied the effect of five non-digestible carbohydrates on the resistance of guinea pigs to Listeria monocytogenes infections. Animals were fed a diet supplemented with 10% xylooligosaccharides (XOS), galactooligosaccharides (GOS), inulin, apple pectin or polydextrose for three weeks before oral infection with a mixture of three different fluorescently labeled L monocytogenes strains. Colonisation of L. monocytogenes in the intestine was determined by quantification of L. monocytogenes in faecal, ileal and caecal samples while translocation was determined by quantification of L monocytogenes in mesenteric lymph nodes, spleen and liver. XOS and GOS significantly (P<0.05) improved the resistance of guinea pigs to L monocytogenes, while inulin and apple pectin decreased the resistance (P<0.05). No significant effect on resistance to L. monocytogenes was seen after feeding with polydextrose. No difference in caecal weight or pH between the dietary groups was measured, except for a higher caecal weight and a lower caecal pH of animals fed with XOS, and a lower caecal pH for animals fed with polydextrose. In conclusion, this study shows for the first time that different non-digestible carbohydrates can have entirely different effects on the intestinal colonisation and translocation of a pathogenic bacterium. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据