4.7 Article

A combination of heat treatment and Pichia guilliermondii prevents cherry tomato spoilage by fungi

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
卷 137, 期 1, 页码 106-110

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.11.002

关键词

Cherry tomato fruit; Heat treatment; Pichia guilliermondii; Postharvest fungal spoilage

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30771512]
  2. Jiangsu Provincial Postgraduate Innovation Project of China [CX08B_147Z]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effectiveness of heat treatment and Pichia guilliermondii, either alone or in combination, to combat postharvest fungal spoilage in cherry tomato fruit. In vitro experiments demonstrated that heat treatment at 38 degrees C significantly inhibited mycelial growth of three different pathogens (Botrytis cinerea, Alternaria alternata and Rhizopus stolonifer Ehrenb). In vivo experiments unveiled that either heat treatment or P. guilliermondii reduced decay caused by these pathogens. Furthermore, a combination of heat treatment followed by the application of P. guilliermondii (H + P) provided the best efficacy in prevention of cherry tomato from fungal spoilage. Following, H + P treatment, electronic nose detected a reduction of volatility in cherry tomato fruit odor, an indicator of preserving fruit's freshness. Scanning electron microscopy unveiled that heat treatment at 38 degrees C for 24 h inhibited hyphae growth and spore germination of R. stolonifer Ehrenb while P. guilliermondii multiplied rapidly on fruit wounds, and its cells had a strong capability of adhesion to the hyphae of R. stolonifer Ehrenb. However, heat treatment also seriously injured P. guilliermondii, therefore P. guilliermondii should be applied after heat treatment. A combination of heat treatment and P. guilliermondii is one of the most effective techniques at controlling postharvest fungal spoilage in cherry tomato fruit. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据