4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Thermal fatigue and failure of electronic power device substrates

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE
卷 31, 期 11-12, 页码 1911-1920

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.03.011

关键词

Variable amplitude fatigue; Overloads; Weibull; Aluminium nitride; Copper

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electronic power devices used for transportation applications (automotive and avionics) experience severe temperature variations, which promote their thermal fatigue and failure. For example, for power modules mounted on the engine of an aircraft, temperature variations range from -55 degrees C (in the worst case of storage before takeoff) to +200 degrees C (flight). Direct bonded copper (DBC) substrates are used to isolate chips (silicon dies) from their base plates. For large thermal amplitudes, the failure occurs in DBC substrates, which are copper/ceramic/copper sandwiches. The Weibull approach was used to model the brittle fracture of the ceramic layer from a natural defect. Furthermore, geometric singularities in the upper ceramic/copper interface are at the origin of cracks that grow by fatigue along the interface and finally bifurcate and break the ceramic layer. It is discussed how the framework of linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) can be used to characterize the stress field around singularities and the associated risk of failure. These two criteria and the finite element method, allow analysing how a thermal loading history may modify the risk of failure of DBC substrates. It was shown, in particular, that three overcooling cycles should produce an overload retardation effect. Experimentally, applying three overload cycles (-70 degrees C, +180 degrees C), prior to thermal fatigue cycles (-30 degrees C, +180 degrees C), increased very significantly the fatigue life of DBC substrates. This result shows that the fatigue life and the reliability of power electronic devices could be optimized using a thermo-mechanical approach of the problem and suitable failure criteria. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据