4.7 Article

Data Resource Profile: The World Health Organization Study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE)

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 41, 期 6, 页码 1639-1649

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dys210

关键词

-

资金

  1. Division of Behavioral and Social Research (BSR) at the National Institute on Aging (NIA)
  2. US National Institutes of Health [OGHA 04034785, YA1323-08-CN-0020, Y1-AG-1005-01]
  3. WHO
  4. NIA
  5. The US NIA BSR [OGHA 04034785]
  6. Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research [2006-1512]
  7. FAS
  8. The US NIA BSR
  9. [1 R01 AG034479-01A1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Population ageing is rapidly becoming a global issue and will have a major impact on health policies and programmes. The World Health Organization's Study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE) aims to address the gap in reliable data and scientific knowledge on ageing and health in low- and middle-income countries. SAGE is a longitudinal study with nationally representative samples of persons aged 50+ years in China, Ghana, India, Mexico, Russia and South Africa, with a smaller sample of adults aged 18-49 years in each country for comparisons. Instruments are compatible with other large high-income country longitudinal ageing studies. Wave 1 was conducted during 2007-2010 and included a total of 34 124 respondents aged 50+ and 8340 aged 18-49. In four countries, a subsample consisting of 8160 respondents participated in Wave 1 and the 2002/04 World Health Survey (referred to as SAGE Wave 0). Wave 2 data collection will start in 2012/13, following up all Wave 1 respondents. Wave 3 is planned for 2014/15. SAGE is committed to the public release of study instruments, protocols and meta- and micro-data: access is provided upon completion of a Users Agreement available through WHO's SAGE website (www.who.int/healthinfo/systems/sage) and WHO's archive using the National Data Archive application (http://apps.who.int/healthinfo/systems/surveydata).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据