4.7 Article

Maternal anaemia and preterm birth: a prospective cohort study

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 38, 期 5, 页码 1380-1389

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyp243

关键词

Haemoglobin; maternal anaemia; medically indicated preterm birth; preterm premature rupture of membranes; spontaneous preterm labour

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background The role of maternal anaemia in preterm birth remains poorly defined, and the association between anaemia and preterm birth clinical subtypes remain unclear. We examined if maternal anaemia exposure both within and across trimesters during gestation is associated with preterm. birth. Methods This was a secondary analysis of data from a population-based prospective cohort study in 13 counties of East China (1993-96). All singleton live births delivered at 20-44 weeks to women with at least one haemoglobin measure during pregnancy were included (n = 160700). Risk of preterm birth (< 37 weeks) was examined by clinical subtypes, namely, preterm premature rupture of membranes (PROM), spontaneous preterm labour and medically indicated preterm birth. Haemoglobin changes across trimesters were assessed as proxy of haemo-dilution and haemo-concentration. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were fitted. Results Preterm birth rates of preterm birth were 4.1% for anaemic and 5% for non-anaemic women (P < 0.05). Compared with haemoglobin of 11 g/dl (reference), values <= 5 g/dl in the first trimester were associated with increased risk for preterm PROM [hazard ratio (HR) 3.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-7.7], whereas low haemoglobin in the third trimester was associated with reduced risk of spontaneous preterm labour. Haemodilution was associated with reduced risk for preterm birth. Conclusions Anaemia in early pregnancy was found to be associated with increased risk for preterm PROM, whereas exposure in late pregnancy was associated with reduced risk for spontaneous preterm labour.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据