4.7 Article

Use of acetaminophen during pregnancy and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 38, 期 3, 页码 706-714

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyp151

关键词

Acetaminophen; coffee; low birth weight; pre-eclampsia; premature birth; spontaneous abortion; stillbirth; tobacco

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Acetaminophen use during pregnancy has been associated with a reduced risk of stillbirth and preterm birth, but findings are based on few studies with small numbers of exposed women. Methods To examine whether prenatal exposure to acetaminophen reduces the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, we used data from the Danish National Birth Cohort. We also examined the combined potential effects of acetaminophen, coffee and tobacco use on pre-eclampsia and preterm birth. The study population consisted of women who provided information on acetaminophen use during pregnancy and gave birth to singletons (n = 98 140). The cohort was linked to the Danish National Hospital Registry and the Medical Birth Registry, which covers all Danish hospitals, miscarriages and births in Denmark. Results Women using acetaminophen during the third trimester of pregnancy had an increased risk of preterm birth [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.14, 95% CI: 1.03-1.26]. The risk of preterm birth was increased in mothers with pre-eclampsia (HR 1.55, 95% CI: 1.16-2.07) but not in women without pre-eclampsia (HR 1.08, 95% CI: 0.97-1.20). Tobacco smoking and coffee consumption did not modify the effect of acetaminophen in any consistent pattern. No association was found between acetaminophen use and risk of preterm complications, miscarriages, stillbirths, low birth weight or small size for gestational age. Conclusion Findings do not provide strong support for a change in clinical practice regarding use of acetaminophen during pregnancy, but the increased risk of preterm birth among women with pre-eclampsia should be further investigated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据