4.3 Article

Determination of 41 polybrominated diphenyl ethers in soil using a pressurised solvent extraction and GC-NCI-MS method

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03067310903428750

关键词

PBDEs; PSE extraction; GC-NCI-MS; soil; e-waste recycling site

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of P.R. China [20507010, 50538090]
  2. Distinguished Young Scholars Project [50625823]
  3. program of 'Research on key Technology of Environment Pollution Control and Quality Improvement' [2007DFC90170]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A rapid and reliable analytical method based on pressurised solvent extraction (PSE) and GC-NCI-MS was developed for the determination of 41 different PBDEs in soil. All PBDEs, including mono- to hepta-BDEs (sum of 39 congeners), one nona-BDE and deca-BDE, were efficiently extracted from soil samples using the extraction technology of PSE. The extract was then cleaned up on a florisil column. Satisfactory separation of 41 PBDE congeners was obtained on a 15-m DB-5MS capillary column, saving the use of another 30-m column specific for the separation of mono-to hepta-BDEs. PBDEs were identified and quantified by GC-MS in negative chemical ionisation (NCI) mode, and further confirmed in semi electron impact (SEI) mode when the ion source was also NCI. The method detection limits ranged from 0.01 to 0.03 ng g(-1) dw for mono- to hepta-BDEs, 1.43 ng g(-1) dw for the nona-BDE and 0.20 ng g(-1) dw for deca-BDE. The applicability of the method was tested in soil samples collected from an e-waste recycling site at Guiyu. Twenty-one PBDEs (mono- to deca-) were detected, and eighteen congeners were quantified. The concentration range of PBDEs was 0.78-436 ng g(-1) dw. BDE-47, BDE-99, BDE-153, BDE-183, BDE-206 and BDE-209 were the dominant congeners, and BDE-209 accounted for 62% of the total PBDEs. The congener profiles of PBDEs in soil samples were similar to those in three commercial PBDE products (Penta-, Octa- and Deca-BDE), and Deca-BDE product was the most important contributor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据