4.4 Article

How might eating disorders stigmatization worsen eating disorders symptom severity? Evaluation of a stigma internalization model

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EATING DISORDERS
卷 51, 期 8, 页码 1010-1014

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eat.22932

关键词

alienation; eating disorders; social withdrawal; stigma; stigma internalization

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council [1121538]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective Eating disorders stigmatization is common and is associated with greater eating disorders symptom severity. This study sought to elucidate stigma internalization as a potential mechanism underlying this association. Two central aspects of stigma internalization were focused on: alienation and social withdrawal. MethodResultsA cross-national sample of individuals with self-reported eating disorders (N =260) completed measures of eating disorders stigmatization, symptom severity, alienation, and social withdrawal. The model evidenced excellent fit. Eating disorders stigmatization directly predicted both alienation and social withdrawal, which, in turn, directly predicted symptom severity. Indirect effect analyses indicated that greater eating disorders stigmatization ultimately predicted greater symptom severity via alienation and social withdrawal. Moreover, social withdrawal mediated the association of alienation with symptom severity. Fitting a direct pathway from eating disorder stigmatization to symptom severity did not improve model fit. DiscussionOur model provides a potentially useful account of the mechanisms by which eating disorders stigmatization might worsen eating disorder symptom severity. Specifically, the stigma internalization processes of alienation and social withdrawal may be important factors linking stigmatization with symptom severity. The findings have implications for clinicians attempting to help individuals with eating disorders to monitor and modify their responses to eating disorders stigmatization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据