4.4 Article

Determinants of Direct and Indirect Costs in Anorexia Nervosa

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EATING DISORDERS
卷 48, 期 1, 页码 139-146

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eat.22274

关键词

cost-of-illness; cost determinants; anorexia nervosa; economics

资金

  1. German Ministry of Research and Education [01GV1002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectiveTo estimate direct and indirect costs of anorexia nervosa (AN), and to identify cost determinants. MethodsIn a subsample (n=225) of the ANTOP trial (Anorexia Nervosa Treatment of OutPatients) health care utilization and productivity losses were assessed at baseline for the previous 3 months and monetarily valued. Included were females aged 18 years and older diagnosed with AN or subsyndromal AN, and a body mass index (BMI) between 15 and 18.5 kg/m(2). To account for missing data multiple imputation was employed. Cost determinants were derived from generalized linear models with gamma distribution and log link function. ResultsMean 3-months costs per patient amounted to Euro5,866 (SE=Euro576). The largest share of costs (Euro3,374) resulted from hospitalizations. Determinants of direct costs were analyzed separately for those with hospitalizations for AN, and those without. In the group only treated as outpatients, participants with binge/purge subtype, and those diseased for more than 6 years had higher costs. Moreover, costs were increased in patients with a comorbid mental disorder. In the group with hospitalizations, direct costs increased with BMI. BMI was measured at the end of the observation period, indicating that longer duration of treatment yielded higher weight gain. Indirect costs were not significantly associated with any disease-related characteristic. DiscussionCosts resulting from health care utilization and productivity loss are substantial, although the sample studied had not received sufficient treatment. Future research should analyze the development of costs over time. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. (Int J Eat Disord 2015; 48:139-146)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据