4.4 Article

The Fear of Food Measure: A Novel Measure for use in Exposure Therapy for Eating Disorders

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EATING DISORDERS
卷 48, 期 3, 页码 271-283

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eat.22344

关键词

exposure therapy; anorexia nervosa; anxiety about eating; food avoidance; eating disorders

资金

  1. [F31-MH096433-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectiveExposure therapy for mealtime anxiety has preliminarily been effective at increasing food intake and decreasing anxiety in individuals with anorexia nervosa (AN). To enhance our knowledge of exposure therapy for AN researchers and clinicians need a comprehensive measure that assesses outcomes relevant to exposure therapy for AN. MethodIn the current four studies we developed Fear of Food Measure (FOFM) that assesses three cognitive and behavioral outcomes: trait anxiety about eating, food avoidance behaviors, and feared concerns related to eating. ResultsIn a community (N=399) and undergraduate female sample (N=203) the FOFM exhibited a good three-factor structure and convergent and divergent validity. In a sample of women (N=72) we showed that the anxiety about eating subscale significantly predicted in vivo food intake over and above other established predictors of eating (e.g., restraint). In a clinical sample diagnosed with an eating disorder (N=41) we showed that anxiety about eating was associated with food intake and anxiety during an exposure meal and that all subscales of the FOFM significantly decreased over the course of a four-session exposure intervention. Finally, we found that participants diagnosed with an eating disorder had higher levels of fear of food than did matched controls (N=23). DiscussionThe FOFM is a psychometrically valid measure that can assess if patients are improving while undergoing exposure therapy and could be used to pinpoint problematic behaviors that can be addressed in exposure therapy. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Eat Disord 2015; 48:271-283

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据