4.4 Review

The Therapeutic Process in Psychological Treatments for Eating Disorders: A Systematic Review

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EATING DISORDERS
卷 47, 期 6, 页码 565-584

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eat.22287

关键词

psychotherapeutic process; eating disorders; anorexia nervosa; bulimia nervosa; binge-eating disorder

资金

  1. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Germany [01GV0601, 01EO1001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: For eating disorders, a vast number of investigations have demonstrated the efficacy of psychological treatments. However, evidence supporting the impact of therapeutic process aspects on outcome (i.e., process-outcome research) has not been disentangled. Method: Using the Generic Model of Psychotherapy (GMP) to organize various process aspects, a systematic literature search was conducted on psychological treatment studies for anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge-eating disorder, and eating disorders not otherwise specified. Results: Improved outcomes resulted for family-based treatment compared to individual treatment, for individual compared to group treatment, booster sessions, and positive patient expectations (GMP contract aspect); for nutritional counseling and exercising but not exposure with response prevention as adjunct interventions (therapeutic operations); for highly motivated patients and, to a lesser extent, for therapeutic alliance (therapeutic bond); as well as for rapid response and longer overall treatment duration (temporal patterns). Regarding other GMP aspects, studies on self-relatedness were completely lacking and in-session impacts were rarely investigated. Discussion: As most studies assessed only a limited number of process aspects, the ability to draw conclusions about their overall impact regarding outcome is rather limited. Therefore, future processoutcome research is needed beyond investigations of treatment efficacy for eating disorders. (C) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据