4.4 Article

Re-interpreting the Devonian ophiolites involved in the Variscan suture: U-Pb and Lu-Hf zircon data of the Moeche Ophiolite (Cabo Ortegal Complex, NW Iberia)

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES
卷 103, 期 5, 页码 1385-1402

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00531-013-0880-x

关键词

Ophiolites; U-Pb; Lu-Hf zircon; Variscan belt

资金

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [CGL2007-65338-CO2-01, CGL2012-34618]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

New U-Pb zircon data of a mylonitic greenschist from the Moeche Ophiolite, one of the mafic units involved in the Variscan suture in the Cabo Ortegal Complex (NW of the Iberian Massif), yielded an age of 400 +/- A 3 Ma. Consequently, this unit can be considered one of the Devonian ophiolites, the most extended group of oceanic units in the Variscan belt. The mafic rocks show transitional compositions between N-MORB and island-arc tholeiites, although Lu-Hf isotope signatures of its zircons clearly indicate contribution from an old continental source. epsilon Hf values in the analysed zircons are negative (generally below epsilon Hf = -5), and thence, they are not compatible with their generation from a juvenile mantle source. Accordingly, the igneous protoliths were generated in a setting where juvenile mafic magmas interacted with an old continental crust. The Devonian ophiolites from the Variscan suture have been repeatedly interpreted as remnants of the Rheic Ocean. However, the presence of a continental source in the origin of the mafic rocks of the Moeche Ophiolite allows discarding an intraoceanic setting for their generation, at least for the NW Iberian counterparts. The tectonic setting for the Devonian ophiolites of NW Iberia is very likely represented by an ephemeral oceanic basin opened within a continental realm. Herein, the real Rheic Ocean suture could only be located west of the terrane represented by the upper units of the allochthonous complexes. Apparently that suture is not represented in NW Iberia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据