4.7 Article

Determining oil slick thickness using hyperspectral remote sensing in the Bohai Sea of China

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIGITAL EARTH
卷 6, 期 1, 页码 76-93

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17538947.2012.695404

关键词

hyperspectral; optical remote sensing; reflectance; oil slick thickness; oil spill

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41001196]
  2. Key Laboratory of Marine Spill Oil Identification and Damage Assessment Technology, SOA [201212]
  3. Key Laboratory of Digital Earth, Center for Earth Observation and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences [2010LDE007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Determining oil slick thickness plays an important role in assessing oil spill volume and its environmental impacts on the ocean. In this study, we used a Hyperion image of an oil spill accident area and seawater and fresh crude oil samples collected in the Bohai Sea of China. A well-controlled laboratory experiment was designed to simulate spectral responses to different oil slick thicknesses. Spectral resampling and normalization methods were used to reduce the differences in spectral reflectances between the experimental background seawater sample and real background seawater. Fitting the analysis with laboratory experimental data results showed a linear relationship between normalized oil slick reflectance and normalized oil slick thickness [20th band (R 2=0.92938, n=49, p<0.01), 26th band (R 2=0.93806, n=49, p<0.01), 29th band (R 2=0.93288, n=49, p<0.01)]. By using these statistical models, we successfully determined the normalized oil slick thickness with the Hyperion image. Our results indicate that hyperspectral remote sensing technology is an effective method to monitor oil spills on water. The spectral ranges of visible green and red light were the optimal bands for estimating oil slick thickness in case 2 water. The high, stabilized spectral reflectance of background seawater will be helpful in oil slick thickness inversion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据