4.1 Article

Early life arsenic exposure and brain dopaminergic alterations in rats

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2014.08.009

关键词

Brain; Dopaminergic system; Mitochondrial dysfunctions; Oxidative stress; Apoptosis

资金

  1. University Grants Commission, New Delhi
  2. Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, we found that early life exposure to arsenic at low doses resulted to cause brain cholinergic deficits and exhibited a trend of recovery on withdrawal of arsenic exposure. In continuation to this, the present study has been carried out to assess the impact of low level arsenic exposure on brain dopaminergic system and associated behavior in developing rats and investigate if neurobehavioral changes are recovered or persistent. Early life exposure (PD22 PD59) to arsenic (2 or 4 mg/kg body weight, p.o.) in rats resulted to increase the motor activity on PD60, compared to controls. The hyperactivity in arsenic exposed rats was found to be linked with increase in the binding of DA-D2 receptors (38%, 56%), mRNA expression of DAR-D2 receptor gene (68%, 97%) and expression of tyrosine hydroxylase protein (1.93, 2.73-fold) in the corpus striatum as compared to controls on PD60. Exposure to arsenic enhanced generation of ROS (47%, 84%) and was associated with decrease in the mitochondrial membrane potential (13.3%, 15.33%), activity of mitochondrial complexes and increased oxidative stress. Disruption in the expression of pro-apoptotic, anti-apoptotic and stress marker proteins was also distinct in the corpus striatum of arsenic exposed rats. The severity of changes in the behavioral and neurochemical endpoints were found to persist in rats exposed to arsenic at high dose and exhibited a trend of recovery at low dose on withdrawal of arsenic exposure on PD90. Early life arsenic exposure appears to be critical and vulnerable as development of dopamine receptors continues during this period. (C) 2014 ISDN. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据