4.4 Article

Enforcing negative imaginary dynamics on mathematical system models

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTROL
卷 86, 期 7, 页码 1292-1303

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00207179.2013.804951

关键词

negative imaginary systems; Hamiltonian matrices; pointwise frequency scheme

资金

  1. Australian Research Council
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/F06022X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. EPSRC [EP/F06022X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flexible structures with collocated force actuators and position sensors lead to negative imaginary dynamics. However, in some cases, the mathematical models obtained for these systems, for example, using system identification methods may not yield a negative imaginary system. This paper provides two methods for enforcing negative imaginary dynamics on such mathematical models, given that it is known that the underlying dynamics ought to belong to this system class. The first method is based on a study of the spectral properties of Hamiltonian matrices. A test for checking the negativity of the imaginary part of a corresponding transfer function matrix is first developed. If an associated Hamiltonian matrix has pure imaginary axis eigenvalues, the mathematical model loses the negative imaginary property in some frequency bands. In such cases, a first-order perturbation method is proposed for iteratively collapsing the frequency bands whose negative imaginary property is violated and finally displacing the eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian matrix away from the imaginary axis, thus restoring the negative imaginary dynamics. In the second method, direct spectral properties of the imaginary part of a transfer function are used to identify the frequency bands where the negative imaginary properties are violated. A pointwise-in-frequency scheme is then proposed to restore the negative imaginary system properties in the mathematical model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据