4.5 Article

Towards a wisdom manufacturing vision

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/0951192X.2014.972462

关键词

socio-technical systems; CIM; pragmatics; wisdom manufacturing; web-based manufacturing; integration

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51175187, 51375168]
  2. National High-Tech. R&D Program of China [2007AA04Z111]
  3. Science & Technology Foundation of Guangdong Province [2012B030900034]
  4. Science & Technology Foundation of Dongguan City [2012108102010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Manufacturing enterprises are socio-technical systems, which necessitate overall integration of not only the technical aspects from devices in shop-floor to enterprise resources planning vertically and from product order to shipment horizontally, but also the social aspects such as human interactions and consumers' intentions. Moreover, there is a growing need in the use of knowledge in enterprise contexts. To meet such needs, wisdom manufacturing (WM) is emerging with advances in the Internet and manufacturing as well as intelligence. In this paper, the most recently developed manufacturing models such as smart manufacturing (SM)/smart factory (SF), cloud manufacturing (CM) and socialised enterprise (SE)/Enterprise 2.0 are analysed, and a WM vision is presented to aggregate SM, CM, SE and existing intelligent manufacturing (IM) that are complementary to each other. Then pathways towards the WM vision are addressed in relationship to knowledge, intelligence, creativity/innovation, learning and wisdom, especially from DIKW (data-information-knowledge-wisdom) and semiotic perspectives as well as from the web evolution. And wisdom and realisation towards the WM vision are investigated. Finally, a case study is used to illustrate the WM vision landscape followed by a conclusion. As a consequence, things, computers and humans, ubiquitous, artificial and collective intelligence, as well as explicit and tacit knowledge, are integrated as a whole in the WM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据