4.5 Article

Can hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy efficiency be improved by blocking the DNA repair factor COP9 signalosome?

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE
卷 29, 期 6, 页码 673-680

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-014-1861-7

关键词

HIPEC; COP9 signalosome; Chemotherapy; DNA repair; Apoptosis

资金

  1. Charite-Universitatsmedizin Berlin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A frequently used chemotherapeutic agent in hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is mitomycin C (MMC) which induces DNA damage and apoptosis in tumor cells. In addition, MMC activates DNA damage response (DDR) leading to repair mechanisms counteracting the effect of chemotherapy. COP9 signalosome (CSN) positively influences the DDR pathway by its intrinsic deneddylating and associated kinase activities. In an in vitro HIPEC model, we studied the impact of curcumin, an inhibitor of CSN-associated kinases, and of the microRNA (miRNA) let-7a-1, an inhibitor of CSN subunit expression, on the MMC-induced apoptosis in human HT29 colon cancer cells. Cells were incubated at 37 A degrees C and indicated concentrations of MMC in a medium preheated to 42 A degrees C as under HIPEC conditions for 1 or 4 h. HT29 cells were cotreated with 50 mu M curcumin or transfected with let-7a-1 miRNA mimic. After incubation, cells were analyzed by Western blotting, densitometry, and caspase-3 ELISA. An increase of CSN subunits in response to MMC treatment was detected. Apoptosis was only measured after 4 h with 50 mu M MMC. MMC-induced apoptosis was elevated by cotreatment with curcumin. Transfection of HT29 cells with let-7a-1 reduced the expression of tested CSN subunits associated with the accumulation of the pro-apoptotic factors p27 and p53. In response to MMC treatment, the CSN is elevated as a regulator of DDR retarding apoptosis in tumor cells. The therapeutic effect of HIPEC can be increased by inhibiting CSN-associated kinases via curcumin or by blocking CSN expression with let-7a-1 miRNA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据