4.5 Article

Damage control with abdominal vacuum therapy (VAC) to manage perforated diverticulitis with advanced generalized peritonitis-a proof of concept

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE
卷 25, 期 6, 页码 767-774

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-010-0887-8

关键词

Diverticulitis; VAC; Peritonitis; Colostomy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Perforated diverticulitis with advanced generalized peritonitis is a life-threatening condition requiring emergency operation. To reduce the rate of colostomy formation, a new treatment algorithm with damage control operation, lavage, limited closure of perforation, abdominal vacuum-assisted closure (VAC; V.A.C.A (R)), and second look to restore intestinal continuity was developed. This algorithm allowed for three surgical procedures: primary anastomosis +/- VAC in stable patients (group I), but damage control with lavage, limited resection of the diseased colonic segment, VAC and second-look operation with delayed anastomosis in patients with advanced peritonitis or septic shock (group II), and Hartmann procedure was done for social reasons in stable patients (group III) All 27 consecutive patients (16 women; median age 68 years) requiring emergency laparotomy for perforated diverticulitis (Hinchey III/IV) between October 2006 and September 2008 were prospectively enrolled in the study. No major complications were observed in group I (n = 6). Nine patients in group II (n = 15) had intestinal continuity restored during a second-look operation, of whom one patient developed anastomotic leakage. The median length of stay at intensive care unit was 5 days. Considering an overall mortality rate of 26% (n = 7), the rate of anastomosis in surviving patients was 70%. Damage control with lavage, limited bowel resection, VAC, and scheduled second-look operation represents a feasible strategy in patients with perforated diverticulitis (Hinchey III and IV) to enhance sepsis control and improve rate of anastomosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据