4.6 Article

Effect of Heat and Heat Acclimatization on Cycling Time Trial Performance and Pacing

期刊

MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
卷 47, 期 3, 页码 601-606

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000428

关键词

EXERCISE; HOT AMBIENT CONDITIONS; TEMPERATURE; ACCLIMATIZATION; HYPERTHERMIA; FATIGUE

资金

  1. Aspetar, Qatar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: This study aimed to determine the effects of heat acclimatization on performance and pacing during outdoor cycling time trials (TT, 43.4 km) in the heat. Methods: Nine cyclists performed three TT in hot ambient conditions (TTH, approximately 37 degrees C) on the first (TTH-1), sixth (TTH-2), and 14th (TTH-3) days of training in the heat. Data were compared with the average of two TT in cool condition (approximately 8 degrees C) performed before and after heat acclimatization (TTC). Results: TTH-1 (77 +/- 6 min) was slower (P = 0.001) than TTH-2 (69 +/- 5 min), and both were slower (P < 0.01) than TTC and TTH-3 (66 +/- 3 and 66 +/- 4 min, respectively), without differences between TTC and TTH-3 (P 9 0.05). The cyclists initiated the first 20% of all TT at a similar power output, irrespective of climate and acclimatization status; however, during TTH-1, they subsequently had a marked decrease in power output, which was partly attenuated after 6 d of acclimatization and was further reduced after 14 d. HR was higher during the first 20% of TTH-1 than that in the other TT (P < 0.05), but there were no differences between conditions from 30% onward. Final rectal temperature was similar in all TTH (40.2 degrees C +/- 0.4 degrees C, P = 1.000) and higher than that in TTC (38.5 degrees C +/- 0.6 degrees C, P < 0.001). Conclusions: After 2 wk of acclimatization, trained cyclists are capable of completing a prolonged TT in a similar time in the heat compared with cool conditions, whereas in the unacclimatized state, they experienced a marked decrease in power output during the TTH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据