4.7 Article

Accelerating methane desorption in lump anthracite modified by electrochemical treatment

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY
卷 131, 期 -, 页码 392-399

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2014.06.011

关键词

CBM production; Low permeability; Electrochemical modification; Desorption time; Mineral-filled fracture

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51174141, 50974093]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The slow rate of methane desorption in coal can seriously affect the effectiveness of coalbed methane production. An electrochemical method was proposed to modify coal and accelerate methane desorption. The desorption kinetics of methane from lump anthracite, before and after modification, were studied at four adsorption equilibrium pressures using our own manufactured devices, electrochemical modification equipment and lump coal adsorption-desorption apparatus. Based on mercury intrusion tests and SEM-EDS analyses, the possible modification process of accelerating methane desorption in lump anthracite was further analyzed. The results showed that (1) the average desorption rate of methane from anthracite after modification, at the low end of the pressure ranges from 1 to 4 MPa, increased by 68% over the period of reaching desorption equilibration; (2) with increasing adsorption equilibrium pressure, the methane desorption time constant for lump anthracite changed according to negative exponential rules; and (3) in the anodic zone, the mineral-filled fractures of coal samples were unblocked by electrolytic reactions. In the cathodic zone, electrophoresis and electro-osmosis caused charged particles (clay minerals and coal particles) and the electrolyte in the coal matrix and cleats to move, which led to the initiation, development and connection of pores or fractures. These changes increased the number of Darcy flow channels and shortened gas diffusion distance and desorption time. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据